Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0704.0889

Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European universities: prevalent scaling rules in the science system

Anthony F. J. van Raan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

For the 100 largest European universities we studied the statistical properties of bibliometric indicators related to research performance, field citation density and journal impact. We find a size-dependent cumulative advantage for the impact of universities in terms of total number of citations. In previous work a similar scaling rule was found at the level of research groups. Therefore we conjecture that this scaling rule is a prevalent property of the science system. We observe that lower performance universities have a larger size-dependent cumulative advantage for receiving citations than top-performance universities. We also find that for the lower-performance universities the fraction of not-cited publications decreases considerably with size. Generally, the higher the average journal impact of the publications of a university, the lower the number of not-cited publications. We find that the average research performance does not dilute with size. Large top-performance universities succeed in keeping a high performance over a broad range of activities. This most probably is an indication of their scientific attractive power. Next we find that particularly for the lower-performance universities the field citation density provides a strong cumulative advantage in citations per publication. The relation between number of citations and field citation density found in this study can be considered as a second basic scaling rule of the science system. Top-performance universities publish in journals with significantly higher journal impact as compared to the lower performance universities. We find a significant decrease of the fraction of self-citations with increasing research performance, average field citation density, and average journal impact.

Explore related subjects

physics.data-anphysics.soc-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anthony F. J. van Raan. 2007-04-06. Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European universities: prevalent scaling rules in the science system. https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0889

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The BRUIT-FM "open data" noise reduction challenge

The BRUIT-FM Challenge asks participants to reduce ''noise'' --- defined as any signal that masks the signal of interest --- on an open dataset of real and synthetic broadband seafloor seismology data. The dataset includes signals from earthquakes, ocean infragravity waves and seafloor currents. It also includes training datasets of synthetic data with reference solutions. Participants are asked to remove or separate these signals to obtain the best earthquake and seafloor compliance signals. The authors will make a first assessment of the submissions, based on noise reduction, signal deformation and ease of use. Participants are invited to a community workshop, in which they will validate the preliminary assessment and collaborate on a community paper describing the results, identifying promising pathways and proposing new directions. The best results will be added to a new version of the dataset, which will persist as a benchmark for future developments.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

Data geometry preserves prediction but reshapes explanation

Across scientific domains, empirical data often give rise to positive semidefinite matrices that encode similarities, couplings or interactions and induce natural geometries. We investigate whether changing the geometry used to compare the same empirical representations preserves subject-level performance and the local structures from which explanations are derived, a question we term the prediction explanation invariance problem. We address this problem across morphometric MRI, fMRI and EEG data by comparing Frobenius and trace geometries applied to the same empirical matrices. Predictive performance was broadly preserved across geometries, but comparable performance did not imply agreement in subject-level decision scores or predicted labels. Predictive similarity also masked geometry-dependent differences in local neighbourhoods, perturbation sensitivities and explanatory rankings. Dimensionality reduction made the two subject-space geometries progressively more concordant, while classification performance and decision-level agreement declined. These results identify data geometry as a hidden degree of freedom in explainability: similar performance does not guarantee invariant decisions or explanations.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

Modular Aggregation as a Debiasing Method for Non-Stationary Discrete Sources: Convergence and Numerical Validatio

We analyze \emph{modular aggregation}---summing $N$ independent outcomes modulo $m$---as a post-processing method for extracting nearly uniform randomness from biased discrete sources. Using discrete Fourier analysis over the cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_m$, we prove exponential convergence of the output distribution to uniformity, with a rate determined by the largest non-trivial Fourier modulus. The result applies to independent non-stationary (non-IID) sources under a uniform spectral-gap condition on the non-trivial Fourier modes. Numerical simulations under several bias regimes, including cyclic drift and extreme cyclic bias, are used as finite-sample diagnostics and illustrate the theoretical predictions in comparison with Peres extraction and SHA-256 post-processing. The robustness of modular aggregation comes at a retention cost of order $1/N$, yielding an explicit trade-off between statistical quality and throughput.

physics.data-an↗