Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0708.0654

Structure or Noise?

Abstract

We show how rate-distortion theory provides a mechanism for automated theory building by naturally distinguishing between regularity and randomness. We start from the simple principle that model variables should, as much as possible, render the future and past conditionally independent. From this, we construct an objective function for model making whose extrema embody the trade-off between a model's structural complexity and its predictive power. The solutions correspond to a hierarchy of models that, at each level of complexity, achieve optimal predictive power at minimal cost. In the limit of maximal prediction the resulting optimal model identifies a process's intrinsic organization by extracting the underlying causal states. In this limit, the model's complexity is given by the statistical complexity, which is known to be minimal for achieving maximum prediction. Examples show how theory building can profit from analyzing a process's causal compressibility, which is reflected in the optimal models' rate-distortion curve--the process's characteristic for optimally balancing structure and noise at different levels of representation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Susanne Still, James P. Crutchfield. 2008-06-29. Structure or Noise?. https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0654

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The BRUIT-FM "open data" noise reduction challenge

The BRUIT-FM Challenge asks participants to reduce ''noise'' --- defined as any signal that masks the signal of interest --- on an open dataset of real and synthetic broadband seafloor seismology data. The dataset includes signals from earthquakes, ocean infragravity waves and seafloor currents. It also includes training datasets of synthetic data with reference solutions. Participants are asked to remove or separate these signals to obtain the best earthquake and seafloor compliance signals. The authors will make a first assessment of the submissions, based on noise reduction, signal deformation and ease of use. Participants are invited to a community workshop, in which they will validate the preliminary assessment and collaborate on a community paper describing the results, identifying promising pathways and proposing new directions. The best results will be added to a new version of the dataset, which will persist as a benchmark for future developments.

physics.data-an↗

Data geometry preserves prediction but reshapes explanation

Across scientific domains, empirical data often give rise to positive semidefinite matrices that encode similarities, couplings or interactions and induce natural geometries. We investigate whether changing the geometry used to compare the same empirical representations preserves subject-level performance and the local structures from which explanations are derived, a question we term the prediction explanation invariance problem. We address this problem across morphometric MRI, fMRI and EEG data by comparing Frobenius and trace geometries applied to the same empirical matrices. Predictive performance was broadly preserved across geometries, but comparable performance did not imply agreement in subject-level decision scores or predicted labels. Predictive similarity also masked geometry-dependent differences in local neighbourhoods, perturbation sensitivities and explanatory rankings. Dimensionality reduction made the two subject-space geometries progressively more concordant, while classification performance and decision-level agreement declined. These results identify data geometry as a hidden degree of freedom in explainability: similar performance does not guarantee invariant decisions or explanations.

physics.data-an↗

Modular Aggregation as a Debiasing Method for Non-Stationary Discrete Sources: Convergence and Numerical Validatio

We analyze \emph{modular aggregation}---summing $N$ independent outcomes modulo $m$---as a post-processing method for extracting nearly uniform randomness from biased discrete sources. Using discrete Fourier analysis over the cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_m$, we prove exponential convergence of the output distribution to uniformity, with a rate determined by the largest non-trivial Fourier modulus. The result applies to independent non-stationary (non-IID) sources under a uniform spectral-gap condition on the non-trivial Fourier modes. Numerical simulations under several bias regimes, including cyclic drift and extreme cyclic bias, are used as finite-sample diagnostics and illustrate the theoretical predictions in comparison with Peres extraction and SHA-256 post-processing. The robustness of modular aggregation comes at a retention cost of order $1/N$, yielding an explicit trade-off between statistical quality and throughput.

physics.data-an↗