Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0708.0840

Multiple complex networks emerging from individual interactions

Abstract

Systems composed of distinct complex networks are present in many real-world environments, from society to ecological systems. In the present paper, we propose a network model obtained as a consequence of interactions between two species (e.g. predator and prey). Fields are produced and sensed by the individuals, defining spatio-temporal patterns which are strongly affected by the attraction intensity between individuals from the same species. The dynamical evolution of the system, including the change of individuals between different clusters, is investigated by building two complex networks having the individuals as nodes. In the first network, the edge weight is given by the Euclidean distance between every two individuals and, in the case of the second network, by the amount of time two individuals stay close one another. A third network is obtained from the two previous networks whose nodes correspond to the spatially congruent groups. The system evolves to an organized state where Gaussian and scale-free-like strength distributions emerge, respectively, in the predator and prey networks. Such a different connectivity is mainly a consequence of preys elimination. Some configurations favor the survival of preys or higher efficiency of predator activity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luis Enrique Correa da Rocha, Luciano da Fontoura Costa. 2007-08-06. Multiple complex networks emerging from individual interactions. https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0840

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

When is vaccine prioritization worth optimizing?

Optimizing vaccine prioritization is often treated as the default policy response when vaccine supply is limited. Yet optimized prioritization carries administrative, ethical and communication costs, motivating an upstream question: whether differences among vaccine allocations can alter epidemic outcomes enough to make optimization epidemiologically necessary. We show that optimization is not always worth pursuing: in some regimes, vaccination markedly reduces epidemic burden, but many feasible allocation rules perform almost equally well, making the necessity of optimization low. We quantify this necessity as the range of epidemic outcomes generated by different allocations under fixed supply and show that it is governed by competition between vaccinating high-contact groups to slow transmission and vaccinating groups that benefit most directly: necessity is low when these protection routes are balanced and high when one dominates. Increasing transmission intensity changes this balance and drives a transition in the optimal allocation from transmission-focused prioritization toward direct protection. Different prevention objectives exhibit distinct transition thresholds, creating regimes in which optimizing one objective substantially compromises another, thereby revealing when the choice of prevention target matters most. This framework reframes vaccine prioritization as a prior decision problem, identifying when optimization is warranted, when simpler rules suffice, and when prevention goals conflict.

physics.bio-ph↗

Mutual Information in High-Dimensional Neural Coding

Estimating mutual information in large neural populations is limited by the exponential growth of possible neural response patterns. Here we apply a Monte Carlo framework to make this problem tractable by sampling from a conditionally independent population model fit from single-neuron responses. The estimator accurately recovers analytical ground truth, corrects finite-data bias, and scales to empirical recordings containing 100 to 10,000 neurons from visual cortex, hippocampus, and retina. Across systems, stimulus uncertainty decays exponentially with population size, revealing a simple scaling law for high-dimensional neural codes.

physics.bio-ph↗

A dynamic mathematical model for sub-lethal damage recovery: Integrating recovery processes into multi-target theory to visualize damage states

Quantifying the biological effects of radiation is essential for radiotherapy and radiation protection. While research has centered on statistical analyses of experimental data, this approach often fails to elucidate underlying mechanisms, limiting the development of generalizable models. Describing time dependent phenomena, such as sub-lethal damage (SLD) recovery during fractionated irradiation, presents a particularly significant challenge for existing static models. To address this, we developed a mechanistic mathematical model that extends the classical multi-target, single-hit model by introducing explicit recovery transitions among damage states, allowing the simultaneous description of radiation-induced damage accumulation and biological recovery. We applied this model to Elkind and Sutton's classical split-dose experimental data to determine its parameters. The model reproduced the major features of split-dose survival curves for treatments with 0-, 2.5-, and 23-hour recovery intervals. We visualized the temporal changes in damage state distributions within the cell populations. These simulations provided a process-level interpretation of the characteristic shoulder-like response appearing after an inter-fraction recovery interval. Furthermore, the estimated recovery half-life was about 120 minutes, which is broadly consistent with reported timescales of DNA double-strand break repair in mammalian cells, supporting the biological interpretability of the model parameters. The proposed framework provides a simple, interpretable description of radiation-induced cell death dynamics, including SLD recovery, and may serve as a basis for the improved mechanistic modeling of radiobiological effects under different irradiation protocols.

physics.bio-ph↗