Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0708.1252

Saturation of elliptic flow and shear viscosity

A. K. Chaudhuri
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Effect of shear viscosity on elliptic flow is studied in causal dissipative hydrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions. Elliptic flow is reduced in viscous dynamics. Causal evolution of minimally viscous fluid ($η/s$=0.08), can explain the PHENIX data on elliptic flow in 16-23% Au+Au collisions up to $p_T\approx$3.6 GeV. In contrast, ideal hydrodynamics, can explain the same data only up to $p_T\approx$1.5 GeV. $p_T$ spectra of identified particles are also better explained in minimally viscous fluid than in ideal dynamics. However, saturation of elliptic flow at large $p_T$ is not reproduced.

Explore related subjects

nucl-th

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A. K. Chaudhuri. 2007-10-08. Saturation of elliptic flow and shear viscosity. https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1252

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Radiative corrections to the parity-violating spin asymmetry

The parity-violating spin asymmetry Apv for elastic electron scattering from spin-zero nuclei, together with its QED corrections, is evaluated non-perturbatively within the phase-shift analysis. Dispersion corrections, taking into account low-lying transient nuclear excitations, are estimated with the help of the lowest-order $γZ$ box diagrams. Collision energies between 5 $-$ 500 MeV are considered, and results are provided for the $^{12}$C and $^{208}$Pb target nuclei. In addition, we have evaluated Apv at GeV energies and small scattering angles -- relevant for the Pb Radius Experiment (PREx) -- revealing that the low-lying nuclear excited states give no measurable dispersive contribution. However, they are important at lower energies and backward angles.

nucl-th↗
arXiv2026

Quantum Monte Carlo calculations in the nuclear shell model by the complex Langevin method

The nuclear shell model is known to describe the properties of various nuclei extremely well. However, the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo calculations cannot be applied to it with general interactions due to the sign problem. The model has therefore been investigated primarily by variational methods, where the accuracy of the results depends crucially on the ansatz for the wave function. Here we perform the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo calculations in the case of small systems at finite temperature using the complex Langevin method (CLM), which has been successfully applied to various interesting systems with the sign problem over the decade. In particular, we show the existence of a parameter region in which the validity criterion for the CLM is satisfied and the expectation value of the energy obtained by exact diagonalization is correctly reproduced. Thus the CLM can be a complementary approach to the variational method for large systems.

nucl-th↗
arXiv2026

Representation dependence of the neutron-proton kinetic energy in adiabatic deuteron stripping

Deuteron stripping reactions such as (d,p) are a main tool for studying the single-particle structure of nuclei, and they are usually analyzed with the adiabatic distorted-wave approximation (ADWA). With nonlocal nucleon optical potentials, ADWA cross sections change by tens of percent, up to a factor of two, depending on which realistic neutron-proton interaction describes the deuteron. Continuum-discretized calculations change much less, and exact Faddeev calculations reduce the spread by about a factor of ten. Should this sensitivity be read as a probe of neutron-proton physics at short distances? One identified route for it in ADWA is a single number, the neutron-proton kinetic energy averaged over the region where the two nucleons interact. I change the AV18 interaction only at short distances, keeping neutron-proton scattering, the deuteron binding energy, and the long-range tail of the deuteron unchanged. This number then rises from 218 to 314 MeV, more than half of its spread among five realistic interactions, while the coefficient that sets the low-momentum shape of the form factor moves by only one percent of its realistic range. The number therefore reflects how the interaction is written, not anything measured. It enters ADWA through two features that the other calculations treat differently: ADWA weights the deuteron where the two nucleons are close, and it assigns the deuteron energy to the pair however fast the two nucleons move. For this short-range change, an average that keeps the full Gaussian shape of the nonlocal potential, instead of expanding it to lowest order, rises by only 6 MeV against 96 MeV.

nucl-th↗