Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0709.4516

Quantum formalism to describe binocular rivalry

Abstract

On the basis of the general character and operation of the process of perception, a formalism is sought to mathematically describe the subjective or abstract/mental process of perception. It is shown that the formalism of orthodox quantum theory of measurement, where the observer plays a key role, is a broader mathematical foundation which can be adopted to describe the dynamics of the subjective experience. The mathematical formalism describes the psychophysical dynamics of the subjective or cognitive experience as communicated to us by the subject. Subsequently, the formalism is used to describe simple perception processes and, in particular, to describe the probability distribution of dominance duration obtained from the testimony of subjects experiencing binocular rivalry. Using this theory and parameters based on known values of neuronal oscillation frequencies and firing rates, the calculated probability distribution of dominance duration of rival states in binocular rivalry under various conditions is found to be in good agreement with available experimental data. This theory naturally explains an observed marked increase in dominance duration in binocular rivalry upon periodic interruption of stimulus and yields testable predictions for the distribution of perceptual alteration in time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Efstratios Manousakis. 2009-10-13. Quantum formalism to describe binocular rivalry. https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.4516

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

State Space Models Naturally Produce Time Cell and Oscillatory Behaviors and Scale to Abstract Cognitive Functions

A grand challenge in modern neuroscience is bridging the gap between the microscale neural circuits and cognitive functions. While extensive knowledge exists about neuronal connectivity and biophysics, how low-level phenomena give rise to abstract behaviors remains largely unresolved. Here, we propose that a mathematical framework based on State Space Models offers mathematical sufficiency and computational plausibility to generate response profiles that resemble time cells, ramping activity, and oscillatory responses. Our results suggest that such behaviors can emerge from a structured multi-timescale complex rotational basis, which enables optimized history compression and naturally generates structured temporal dynamics even prior to training, mirroring recent findings in biological circuits. Learning exploits and adapts to the pre-existing temporal basis for specific tasks. We show that the model can readily scale to abstract cognitive functions such as event counting, supporting its use as a computationally tractable framework for understanding neural activities.

q-bio.NC↗

How Long Is the Coast of a Neuron? Resolution-Dependent Interaction Order and Computational Capacity

Mandlebrot's coastline paradox reframes measurement as a joint property of an object and its ruler. Here we ask how observational resolution shapes the apparent structure of neural computation. We introduce a scale-indexed decomposition that separates the predictive information captured by direct dependencies from the residual outside that model family. Exact constructions show that projection can convert higher-order dependence into pairwise structure. Projection can increase the direct fraction of surviving information even as total predictive information decreases. A schematic branch-to-soma cascade grounds these effects in local coincidence detection, saturating integration and somatic mixing. Resolving organized nonlinear subunits improves approximation and raises effective representational rank. In a nested hierarchy, these gains occur without increasing information about the target. This distinction separates information availability from access by a restricted readout. A point-neuron or direct population model therefore establishes an effective description at a specified scale. It does not uniquely identify the finer computation that generated the observed relation. Which resolution is adequate depends on the observable and perturbation of interest.

q-bio.NC↗

Reciprocity coordinates a three-way trade-off in recurrent neural circuits

Biological neural circuits contain both unidirectional and reciprocal connections, but how reciprocity affects circuit computation remains unclear. We varied reciprocity \r{ho} across 21 levels in recurrent-network simulations while holding network size, connection density, and directed-edge count fixed. Low-reciprocity networks produced more diverse stimulus-driven activity and performed better on four continuous-input tasks, whereas higher reciprocity generally improved performance on three delayed-memory tasks. Increasing reciprocity reduced online memory capacity and accelerated recovery from perturbations. A post-cue noise experiment showed that higher reciprocity suppressed internal noise propagation but made cue-evoked states less distinguishable, and component matching separated the contributions of cue separation and within-cue dispersion to readout robustness. Within this ensemble, reciprocity thus mediates a three-way trade-off among representational capacity, local stability, and task-state separability: higher reciprocity lowers capacity, strengthens stability, and compresses separability. Whether it improves behaviour depends on whether the stability gain outweighs the lost separation between task states. Connectome and microcircuit datasets from five species showed intermediate reciprocity, while reciprocity varied substantially across adult Drosophila brain regions, providing compatible structural context and motivating circuit-specific functional tests.

q-bio.NC↗