The Student ensemble of correlation matrices: eigenvalue spectrum and Kullback-Leibler entropy

Giulio Biroli; Jean-Philippe Bouchaud; Marc Potters

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0710.0802

The Student ensemble of correlation matrices: eigenvalue spectrum and Kullback-Leibler entropy

Giulio Biroli·Jean-Philippe Bouchaud·Marc Potters

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study a new ensemble of random correlation matrices related to multivariate Student (or more generally elliptic) random variables. We establish the exact density of states of empirical correlation matrices that generalizes the Marcenko-Pastur result. The comparison between the theoretical density of states in the Student case and empirical financial data is surprisingly good, even if we are still able to detect systematic deviations. Finally, we compute explicitely the Kullback-Leibler entropies of empirical Student matrices, which are found to be independent of the true correlation matrix, as in the Gaussian case. We provide numerically exact values for these Kullback-Leibler entropies.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.ST cond-mat.stat-mech physics.data-an

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Giulio Biroli, Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, Marc Potters. 2007-10-03. The Student ensemble of correlation matrices: eigenvalue spectrum and Kullback-Leibler entropy. https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.0802

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

From Cointegration to Out-of-Sample Failure: A Pairs-Trading Case Study on PEP-KO

This paper examines whether a cointegration-based pairs trading strategy between PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola Company is statistically robust and economically exploitable. We first test for cointegration and estimate the spread's mean-reversion dynamics over 2013-2018, then hold these statistical parameters fixed and optimise a threshold-based trading strategy in-sample over 2018-2023. Robustness is assessed through transaction-cost and parameter sensitivity tests, walk-forward validation, and Adjusted and Deflated Sharpe Ratios. The strategy is then evaluated out-of-sample from 2023 to the present, including an analysis of time-varying hedge ratios using rolling OLS and a Kalman filter. The results show that weakening mean-reversion dynamics in the spread undermine the effectiveness of the strategy out-of-sample.

q-fin.ST↗

arXiv2026

Insider Purchases Far Below the 52-Week High: Decomposing the Disclosure Reaction in Microcap Equities

Purchases reported under transaction code P on SEC Form 4 by insiders of U.S. equities with an estimated filing-date capitalization of USD 30 million to USD 500 million (13,534 lines, 1,192 issuers, 2018-2024) are followed by a first-day abnormal return that rises steeply with the stock's distance below its 52-week high: 4.13% in the quintile farthest below the high against 0.86% nearest it (two-way clustered t = 9.77); random non-event days of the same issuers show 0.14%. Five tests with decision rules fixed in advance characterize the gradient. Most of it is scale: the beaten-down stocks are 3.10 times as volatile, and with a full set of controls the raw gap fails its pre-specified bar (0.94 points, t = 2.11). Per unit of the stock's own volatility the reaction is 2.51 times as large far below the high (t = 7.49), 1.28 to 3.50 on other estimators, though a variance-weighted slope shows none. The gradient is larger than for insider sales by the same issuers and for positive earnings surprises as a class; against the strongest surprises the difference is imprecise. Dropping purchases with a concurrent 8-K leaves the raw gradient intact (t = 7.13), but the per-risk gradient no longer clears the controls (t = 2.52). The reaction runs for two to three sessions; the 29-day drift is imprecise (two-way t = 1.70) and a calendar-time portfolio that skips the first day earns no significant alpha. The analysis quantifies sensitivity to price adjustment and benchmark specification: mixing price bases misassigns run-up buckets, and carrying the estimation-window intercept supplies 57% of the 30-day gradient under that benchmark. A gradient-boosting classifier (test AUC 0.676) is indistinguishable from logistic regression. A separate large-cap extension schedules USD 29,075,559 a year of buyer-cluster flow but fails every matched-comparison gate.

q-fin.ST↗

arXiv2026

Cross-Market Alpha: Testing Short-Term Trading Factors in the U.S. Market via Double-Selection LASSO

We test whether 168 short-horizon price-volume signals from the Alpha191 library, originally developed for China's retail-dominated A-share market, contain pricing information for S&P 500 stocks from 2002 to 2022 beyond 153 established U.S. factors. Using the double-selection LASSO of Feng et al. (2020), 17 signals receive significant stochastic discount factor (SDF) loadings in the baseline test-asset design. Their robustness is uneven. Only three signals (a multi-horizon moving-average ratio, a directional-pressure ratio, and a price-gap correlation) remain significant with a finer test-asset grid and under Elastic Net and principal-component control selection; six more pass most checks, and the remaining eight depend on the specification. Robust signals are concentrated in volume-price interaction and short-term mean reversion, whereas volatility-based signals are fragile.

q-fin.ST↗