SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 0711.3656

Various analytic observations on combinations

Abstract

E158 in the Enestrom index. Translation of the Latin original "Observationes analyticae variae de combinationibus" (1741). This paper introduces the problem of partitions, or partitio numerorum (the partition of integers). In the first part of the paper Euler looks at infinite symmetric functions. He defines three types of series: the first denoted with capital Latin letters are sums of powers, e.g. $A=a+b+c+...$, $B=a^2+b^2+c^3+...$, etc.; the second denoted with lower case Greek letters are the elementary symmetric functions; the third denoted with Germanic letters are sums of all combinations of $n$ symbols, e.g. $\mathfrak{A}=a+b+c+...$ is the series for $n=1$, $\mathfrak{B}=a^2+ab+b^2+ac+bc+c^2+...$ is the series for $n=2$, etc. Euler proves a lot of relations between these series. He defines some infinite products and proves some more relations between the products and these series. Then in §17 he looks at the particular case where $a=n,b=n^2,c=n^3$ etc. In §19 he says the Naudé has proposed studying the number of ways to break an integer into a certain number of parts. Euler proves his recurrence relations for the number of partitions into a $μ$ parts with repetition and without repetition. Finally at the end of the paper Euler states the pentagonal number theorem, but says he hasn't been able to prove it rigorously.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Leonhard Euler. 2007-11-22. Various analytic observations on combinations. https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3656

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO