Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0803.1715

Disproof of the Continuum Hypothesis and Determination of the Cardinality of Continuum by Approximations of Sets

Slavko Rede
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A set theory is developed based on the approximations of sets and denoted by AS. In AS the set of all sets exists but the argument for Russell's and Cantor's paradox fail. The Axioms of Separation, Replacement and Foundation are not valid. All the other axioms of ZF are valid and all the basic sets, such as complement, intersection and cartesian product, exist although complement is not quite the same set as in ZF. The set of all sets can be equipped with the topology of approximations (Ta). Every set is closed and every function is continuous in Ta. This implies that the Continuum Hypothesis is false. The sets containing a subset which is perfect in Ta are of the greatest cardinality. A simple observation shows that the concept of well-ordering must be defined in a slightly different way than in ZF. We prove that a set can be well-ordered if and only if it has no perfect subset. Therefore the cardinalities of arbitrary sets are always comparable without assuming the Axiom of Choice. The cardinals following the smallest infinite cardinal w are 2w, 3w, ..., w^2, 2w^2, 3w^2, >..., w^3.... each being of greater cardinality than the previous one, which is not the case in ZF. Immediately after these cardinals does not follow w^w which is not a well-orderable set but some well-ordered cardinal k, and this one is followed by the cardinals 2k, 3k, ..., k^2, 2k^2, 3k^2, ..., k^3...., etc. The greatest cardinal is P(w) and is not a well-orderable set. The cofinality of a well-ordered set is either 2 or w. The only regular cardinals are 0, 1, 2, w and P(w). All other cardinals are singular. The only strong limit cardinal is w. The only inaccessible cardinal is P(w). Strongly inaccessible cardinals do not exist.

Explore related subjects

math.GM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Slavko Rede. 2009-04-15. Disproof of the Continuum Hypothesis and Determination of the Cardinality of Continuum by Approximations of Sets. https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.1715

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Average Chord Lengths in a Triangle

Let $P$ be a point inside a triangle $T$. We consider the average length of the chords of $T$ through $P$, where the direction of the chord is chosen uniformly. An elementary formula is obtained in terms of the distances from $P$ to the sides and vertices of the triangle. Several classical triangle centers give especially simple specializations. For example, if $I$ is the incenter, then \[ M_T(I)=\frac{2r}{\pi} \log\left(\cot\frac A4\cot\frac B4\cot\frac C4\right). \] Our main result is the sharp inequality \[ M_T(P)\le \frac{p}{\pi\sqrt3}\log(2+\sqrt3), \] valid simultaneously for every triangle of perimeter $p$ and every interior point $P$. Thus, among all such pairs $(T,P)$, the largest possible average chord length occurs only when $T$ is equilateral and $P$ is its center. The proof is an elementary symmetrization argument. We close with brief remarks relating the problem to the radial center of a convex body, the electrostatic potential center of a triangle, and dual quermassintegrals.

math.GM↗
arXiv2026

A Proof of Liu's Conjecture on the Fundamental Triangle Inequality

Let $a,b,c$ be the side lengths of a triangle, and let $R$ and $r$ denote its circumradius and inradius, respectively. We prove a conjecture of Liu stating that \[\sum_{\mathrm{cyc}} \left(\frac{a(b+c-a)}{bc}\right)^k \geq 2+\left(\frac{2r}{R}\right)^k,~~k>1, \] with the reverse inequality for $0<k<1$. The proof reduces the problem to three positive variables with fixed sum and product. We also determine the equality cases.

math.GM↗