arXiv · 0803.4058
Crime and punishment in scientific research
Abstract
Typical arguments against scientific misconduct generally fail to support current policies on research fraud: they may not prove wrong what is usually considered research misconduct and they tend to make wrong things that are not normally seen as scientific fraud, in particular honest errors. I also point out that sanctions are not consistent with the reasons why scientific fraud is supposed to be wrong either. Moreover honestly seeking truth should not be contrived as a moral rule -- it is instead a necessary condition for work to qualify as scientific. Keywords: cheating; ethics; fabrication; falsification; integrity; plagiarism; research fraud; scientific misconduct.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Mathieu Bouville. 2008-09-17. Crime and punishment in scientific research. https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.4058
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.