SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 0807.0900

Polytopes with mass linear functions, part I

Abstract

We analyze mass linear functions $H$ on simple polytopes $\De$, where a mass linear function is an affine function on $\De$ whose value on the center of mass depends linearly on the positions of the supporting hyperplanes. We show that certain types of symmetries of $\De$ give rise to nonconstant mass linear functions on $\De$. These are called inessential; the others are essential. We also show that most polytopes do not admit any nonconstant mass linear functions. Our main result shows that there is only one family of smooth polytopes of dimension $\leq 3$ which admit essential mass linear functions. These results have geometric implications. Fix a symplectic toric manifold $(M,\om,T,Φ)$ with moment polytope $\De = Φ(M)$; let $\Symp(M,\om)$ be its group of symplectomorphisms. Any linear function $H$ on $\De$ generates a Hamiltonian $\R$ action on $M$ whose closure is a subtorus $T_H$ of $T$. We show that if the map $π_1(T_H)\to π_1(\Symp(M,\om))$ has finite image, then $H$ is mass linear. Therefore, in most cases the induced map $π_1(T) \to π_1(\Symp(M,\om))$ is an injection. We also show that this map does not have finite image unless $M$ is a product of projective spaces. Moreover, the inessential $H$ correspond to elements in the kernel of the map $π_1(T)\to \Isom(M)$, where the Kahler isometry group $\Isom(M)\subset \Symp(M,\om)$ consists of elements that also preserve the natural compatible complex structure on $M$. Therefore if $\De$ supports no nonconstant essential mass linear $H$, the map $π_1(\Isom(M))\to pi_1(\Symp(M,\om)$ is injective.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dusa McDuff, Susan Tolman. 2009-11-11. Polytopes with mass linear functions, part I. https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.0900

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Extended Future Tube Conjecture for Unipotent Subgroups

Let $\Omega$ be the Lorentz future cone in $\mathbb{R}^{d+1}$ with respect to the Lorentz product and let $T^M$ be the $M$-fold product of the future tube $T=\mathbb{R}^{d+1}+i\Omega$. The Lorentz group $\mathrm{SO}_0(1,d)$ acts diagonally on $T^M$, and its complexification $\mathrm{SO}(1,d)^\mathbb{C}$ acts on $\mathbb{C}^{(d+1)\times M}$. We prove that the domain $G^\mathbb{C}\cdot T^M$ is a Stein manifold for any connected unipotent subgroup $G$ of $\mathrm{SO}_0(1,d)$.

math.SG

The First Correction Term in the Asymptotic Expansion of Bohr--Sommerfeld Lagrangian States

Let $\Lambda$ be a compact Bohr--Sommerfeld Lagrangian submanifold of a compact K\"ahler manifold equipped with a holomorphic prequantum line bundle. We study the asymptotic expansion of the Lagrangian states associated with $\Lambda$. In particular, we compute explicitly the first nontrivial correction term and show that it is expressed in terms of geometric invariants of the ambient K\"ahler manifold and the Lagrangian submanifold, including their scalar curvatures, the second fundamental form, and the mean curvature. As a consequence, we obtain the corresponding second-order asymptotic formula for the $L^2$-norm of the Lagrangian states.

math.SG

Classification of Legendrian doubles and suspensions

We define a construction of Legendrians inside contact manifolds that arise by doubling an exact Lagrangian filling in the page of an open book decomposition. This can be seen as a generalization of a previous construction by Courte and Ekholm to arbitrary open books. These Legendrians, called Legendrian doubles, are shown to admit regular flexible exact Lagrangian fillings, and they are thus classified up to Legendrian isotopy by classical data. Finally, we show that the Legendrian suspension construction, as defined by Arikan and the author in previous work,-this is a Legendrian contained inside a page of an open book that is obtained by using Seidel's suspension of Lefschetz fibrations- is a Legendrian double.

math.SG