SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 0809.2097

Algorithms for Locating Constrained Optimal Intervals

Abstract

In this work, we obtain the following new results. 1. Given a sequence $D=((h_1,s_1), (h_2,s_2) ..., (h_n,s_n))$ of number pairs, where $s_i>0$ for all $i$, and a number $L_h$, we propose an O(n)-time algorithm for finding an index interval $[i,j]$ that maximizes $\frac{\sum_{k=i}^{j} h_k}{\sum_{k=i}^{j} s_k}$ subject to $\sum_{k=i}^{j} h_k \geq L_h$. 2. Given a sequence $D=((h_1,s_1), (h_2,s_2) ..., (h_n,s_n))$ of number pairs, where $s_i=1$ for all $i$, and an integer $L_s$ with $1\leq L_s\leq n$, we propose an $O(n\frac{T(L_s^{1/2})}{L_s^{1/2}})$-time algorithm for finding an index interval $[i,j]$ that maximizes $\frac{\sum_{k=i}^{j} h_k}{\sqrt{\sum_{k=i}^{j} s_k}}$ subject to $\sum_{k=i}^{j} s_k \geq L_s$, where $T(n')$ is the time required to solve the all-pairs shortest paths problem on a graph of $n'$ nodes. By the latest result of Chan \cite{Chan}, $T(n')=O(n'^3 \frac{(\log\log n')^3}{(\log n')^2})$, so our algorithm runs in subquadratic time $O(nL_s\frac{(\log\log L_s)^3}{(\log L_s)^2})$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hsiao-Fei Liu, Peng-An Chen, Kun-Mao Chao. 2008-09-11. Algorithms for Locating Constrained Optimal Intervals. https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.2097

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS