Binar Shuffle Algorithm: Shuffling Bit by Bit

William F. Gilreath

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0811.3449

Binar Shuffle Algorithm: Shuffling Bit by Bit

William F. Gilreath

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Frequently, randomly organized data is needed to avoid an anomalous operation of other algorithms and computational processes. An analogy is that a deck of cards is ordered within the pack, but before a game of poker or solitaire the deck is shuffled to create a random permutation. Shuffling is used to assure that an aggregate of data elements for a sequence S is randomly arranged, but avoids an ordered or partially ordered permutation. Shuffling is the process of arranging data elements into a random permutation. The sequence S as an aggregation of N data elements, there are N! possible permutations. For the large number of possible permutations, two of the possible permutations are for a sorted or ordered placement of data elements--both an ascending and descending sorted permutation. Shuffling must avoid inadvertently creating either an ascending or descending permutation. Shuffling is frequently coupled to another algorithmic function -- pseudo-random number generation. The efficiency and quality of the shuffle is directly dependent upon the random number generation algorithm utilized. A more effective and efficient method of shuffling is to use parameterization to configure the shuffle, and to shuffle into sub-arrays by utilizing the encoding of the data elements. The binar shuffle algorithm uses the encoding of the data elements and parameterization to avoid any direct coupling to a random number generation algorithm, but still remain a linear O(N) shuffle algorithm.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

William F. Gilreath. 2008-11-21. Binar Shuffle Algorithm: Shuffling Bit by Bit. https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3449

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗