SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 0903.0094

Dynamic Conjectures in Random Access Networks Using Bio-inspired Learning

Abstract

This paper considers a conjecture-based distributed learning approach that enables autonomous nodes to independently optimize their transmission probabilities in random access networks. We model the interaction among multiple self-interested nodes as a game. It is well-known that the Nash equilibria in this game result in zero throughput for all the nodes if they take myopic best-response, thereby leading to a network collapse. This paper enables nodes to behave as intelligent entities which can proactively gather information, form internal conjectures on how their competitors would react to their actions, and update their beliefs according to their local observations. In this way, nodes are capable to autonomously "learn" the behavior of their competitors, optimize their own actions, and eventually cultivate reciprocity in the random access network. To characterize the steady-state outcome, the conjectural equilibrium is introduced. Inspired by the biological phenomena of "derivative action" and "gradient dynamics", two distributed conjecture-based action update mechanisms are proposed to stabilize the random access network. The sufficient conditions that guarantee the proposed conjecture-based learning algorithms to converge are derived. Moreover, it is shown that all the achievable operating points in the throughput region are essentially stable conjectural equilibria corresponding to different conjectures. We investigate how the conjectural equilibrium can be selected in heterogeneous networks and how the proposed methods can be extended to ad-hoc networks. Simulations verify that the system performance significantly outperforms existing protocols, such as IEEE 802.11 DCF protocol and the PMAC protocol, in terms of throughput, fairness, convergence, and stability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yi Su, Mihaela van der Schaar. 2009-12-08. Dynamic Conjectures in Random Access Networks Using Bio-inspired Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.0094

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT