SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 0905.2254

On the infinity of infinities of orders of the infinitely large and infinitely small

Abstract

Translation (by J.B.) from the original Latin of Euler's "De infinities infinitis gradibus tam infinite magnorum quam infinite parvorum" (1780). E507 in the Eneström index. Euler discusses orders of infinity in this paper. In other words this paper is about how different functions approach infinity or 0 at different rates. I was not certain about what Euler means by "infinities infiniti". Probably he means that $x,x^2,x^3$, etc. are infinitely many orders of infinity, and $\log x,(\log x)^2, (\log x)^3$, etc. are infinitely many orders of infinity, so the combinations of them are an infinity of infinities of orders of infinity. In fact Euler mentions other orders of infinity in this paper. It would be worthwhile to study this paper more to figure out exactly what Euler means here. Another translation of the title is "On the infinitely infinite orders of the infinitely large and infinitely small". Here's another place Euler uses the phrase "infinities infiniti". The phrase "infinities infiniti" from the title is used by Euler also in section 21 of E302, "De motu vibratio tympanorum". Truesdell translates this phrase on p. 333 of "The rational mechanics of flexible or elastic bodies" as "infinity of infinities". I'd like to thank Martin Mattmueller for clearing up some questions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Leonhard Euler, Jordan Bell. 2009-05-16. On the infinity of infinities of orders of the infinitely large and infinitely small. https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2254

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO