Scheduling with Outliers

Anupam Gupta; Ravishankar Krishnaswamy; Amit Kumar; Danny Segev

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03685-9_12

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0906.2020

Scheduling with Outliers

Anupam Gupta·Ravishankar Krishnaswamy·Amit Kumar·Danny Segev

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In classical scheduling problems, we are given jobs and machines, and have to schedule all the jobs to minimize some objective function. What if each job has a specified profit, and we are no longer required to process all jobs -- we can schedule any subset of jobs whose total profit is at least a (hard) target profit requirement, while still approximately minimizing the objective function? We refer to this class of problems as scheduling with outliers. This model was initiated by Charikar and Khuller (SODA'06) on the minimum max-response time in broadcast scheduling. We consider three other well-studied scheduling objectives: the generalized assignment problem, average weighted completion time, and average flow time, and provide LP-based approximation algorithms for them. For the minimum average flow time problem on identical machines, we give a logarithmic approximation algorithm for the case of unit profits based on rounding an LP relaxation; we also show a matching integrality gap. For the average weighted completion time problem on unrelated machines, we give a constant factor approximation. The algorithm is based on randomized rounding of the time-indexed LP relaxation strengthened by the knapsack-cover inequalities. For the generalized assignment problem with outliers, we give a simple reduction to GAP without outliers to obtain an algorithm whose makespan is within 3 times the optimum makespan, and whose cost is at most (1 + ε) times the optimal cost.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Anupam Gupta, Ravishankar Krishnaswamy, Amit Kumar, Danny Segev. 2009-06-10. Scheduling with Outliers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03685-9_12

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗