SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 0906.4816

Sharp kernel clustering algorithms and their associated Grothendieck inequalities

Abstract

In the kernel clustering problem we are given a (large) $n\times n$ symmetric positive semidefinite matrix $A=(a_{ij})$ with $\sum_{i=1}^n\sum_{j=1}^n a_{ij}=0$ and a (small) $k\times k$ symmetric positive semidefinite matrix $B=(b_{ij})$. The goal is to find a partition $\{S_1,...,S_k\}$ of $\{1,... n\}$ which maximizes $ \sum_{i=1}^k\sum_{j=1}^k (\sum_{(p,q)\in S_i\times S_j}a_{pq})b_{ij}$. We design a polynomial time approximation algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio of $\frac{R(B)^2}{C(B)}$, where $R(B)$ and $C(B)$ are geometric parameters that depend only on the matrix $B$, defined as follows: if $b_{ij} = < v_i, v_j>$ is the Gram matrix representation of $B$ for some $v_1,...,v_k\in \R^k$ then $R(B)$ is the minimum radius of a Euclidean ball containing the points $\{v_1, ..., v_k\}$. The parameter $C(B)$ is defined as the maximum over all measurable partitions $\{A_1,...,A_k\}$ of $\R^{k-1}$ of the quantity $\sum_{i=1}^k\sum_{j=1}^k b_{ij}< z_i,z_j>$, where for $i\in \{1,...,k\}$ the vector $z_i\in \R^{k-1}$ is the Gaussian moment of $A_i$, i.e., $z_i=\frac{1}{(2π)^{(k-1)/2}}\int_{A_i}xe^{-\|x\|_2^2/2}dx$. We also show that for every $\eps > 0$, achieving an approximation guarantee of $(1-\e)\frac{R(B)^2}{C(B)}$ is Unique Games hard.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Subhash Khot, Assaf Naor. 2009-06-25. Sharp kernel clustering algorithms and their associated Grothendieck inequalities. https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.4816

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS