SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 0909.4224

Breaking the 2^n-Barrier for Irredundance: A Parameterized Route to Solving Exact Puzzles

Abstract

The lower and the upper irredundance numbers of a graph $G$, denoted $ir(G)$ and $IR(G)$ respectively, are conceptually linked to domination and independence numbers and have numerous relations to other graph parameters. It is a long-standing open question whether determining these numbers for a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices admits exact algorithms running in time less than the trivial $Ω(2^n)$ enumeration barrier. We solve these open problems by devising parameterized algorithms for the dual of the natural parameterizations of the problems with running times faster than $O^*(4^{k})$. For example, we present an algorithm running in time $O^*(3.069^{k})$ for determining whether $IR(G)$ is at least $n-k$. Although the corresponding problem has been known to be in FPT by kernelization techniques, this paper offers the first parameterized algorithms with an exponential dependency on the parameter in the running time. Additionally, our work also appears to be the first example of a parameterized approach leading to a solution to a problem in exponential time algorithmics where the natural interpretation as an exact exponential-time algorithm fails.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ljiljana Brankovic, Henning Fernau, Joachim Kneis, Dieter Kratsch Alexander Langer Mathieu Liedloff Daniel Raible Peter Rossmanith. 2009-09-23. Breaking the 2^n-Barrier for Irredundance: A Parameterized Route to Solving Exact Puzzles. https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.4224

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS