Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0912.0568

Hardness Amplification in Proof Complexity

Paul Beame·Trinh Huynh·Toniann Pitassi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a general method for converting any family of unsatisfiable CNF formulas that is hard for one of the simplest proof systems, tree resolution, into formulas that require large rank in any proof system that manipulates polynomials or polynomial threshold functions of degree at most k (known as Th(k) proofs). Such systems include Lovasz-Schrijver and Cutting Planes proof systems as well as their high degree analogues. These are based on analyzing two new proof systems, denoted by T^cc(k) and R^cc(k). The proof lines of T^cc(k) are arbitrary Boolean functions, each of which can be evaluated by an efficient k-party randomized communication protocol. They include Th{k-1} proofs as a special case. R^cc(k) proofs are stronger and only require that each inference be locally checkable by an efficient k-party randomized communication protocol. Our main results are the following: (1) When k is O(loglogn), for any unsatisfiable CNF formula F requiring resolution rank r, there is a related CNF formula G=Lift_k(F) requiring refutation rank r^Omega(1/k) log^O(1) n in all R^cc(k) systems. (2) There are strict hierarchies for T^cc(k) and R^cc(k) systems with respect to k when k is O(loglogn in that there are unsatisfiable CNF formulas requiring large rank R^cc(k) refutations but having log^O(1) n rank Th(k) refutations. (3) When k is O(loglogn) there are 2^(n^Omega(1/k)) lower bounds on the size of tree-like T^cc(k) refutations for large classes of lifted CNF formulas. (4) A general method for producing integrality gaps for low rank R^cc(2) inference (and hence Cutting Planes and Th(1) inference) based on related gaps for low rank resolution. These gaps are optimal for MAX-2t-SAT.

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Paul Beame, Trinh Huynh, Toniann Pitassi. 2009-12-03. Hardness Amplification in Proof Complexity. https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.0568

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC↗