SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1001.2613

Approximating Matrix p-norms

Abstract

We consider the problem of computing the q->p norm of a matrix A, which is defined for p,q \ge 1, as |A|_{q->p} = max_{x !=0 } |Ax|_p / |x|_q. This is in general a non-convex optimization problem, and is a natural generalization of the well-studied question of computing singular values (this corresponds to p=q=2). Different settings of parameters give rise to a variety of known interesting problems (such as the Grothendieck problem when p=1 and q=\infty). However, very little is understood about the approximability of the problem for different values of p,q. Our first result is an efficient algorithm for computing the q->p norm of matrices with non-negative entries, when q \ge p \ge 1. The algorithm we analyze is based on a natural fixed point iteration, which can be seen as an analog of power iteration for computing eigenvalues. We then present an application of our techniques to the problem of constructing a scheme for oblivious routing in the l_p norm. This makes constructive a recent existential result of Englert and Räcke [ER] on O(log n)-competitive oblivious routing schemes (which they make constructive only for p=2). On the other hand, when we do not have any restrictions on the entries (such as non-negativity), we prove that the problem is NP-hard to approximate to any constant factor, for 2 < p \le q, and p \le q < 2 (these are precisely the ranges of p,q with p\le q, where constant factor approximations are not known). In this range, our techniques also show that if NP does not have quasi-polynomial time algorithms, the q->p cannot be approximated to a factor 2^{(log n)^{1-eps}}, for any \eps>0.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aditya Bhaskara, Aravindan Vijayaraghavan. 2010-05-02. Approximating Matrix p-norms. https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.2613

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS