arXiv · 1001.4430
Competing Technologies: Disturbance, Selection, and the Possibilities of Lock-in
Abstract
Arthur's (1988) model for competing technologies is discussed from the perspective of evolution theory. Using Arthur's own model for the simulation, we show that 'lock-ins' can be suppressed by adding reflexivity or uncertainty on the side of consumers. Competing technologies then tend to remain in competition. From an evolutionary perspective, lock-ins and prevailing equilibrium can be considered as different trajectories of the techno-economic systems under study. Our simulation results suggest that technological developments which affect the natural preferences of consumers do not induce changes in trajectory, while changes in network parameters of a technology sometimes induce ordered substitution processes. These substitution processes have been shown empirically (e.g., Fisher & Prey, 1971), but hitherto they have been insufficiently understood from the perspective of evolutionary modelling. Implications for technology policies are discussed.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Loet Leydesdorff, Peter Van den Besselaar. 2010-01-25. Competing Technologies: Disturbance, Selection, and the Possibilities of Lock-in. https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.4430
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.