Metric Extension Operators, Vertex Sparsifiers and Lipschitz Extendability

Konstantin Makarychev; Yury Makarychev

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1006.4607

Metric Extension Operators, Vertex Sparsifiers and Lipschitz Extendability

Konstantin Makarychev·Yury Makarychev

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study vertex cut and flow sparsifiers that were recently introduced by Moitra, and Leighton and Moitra. We improve and generalize their results. We give a new polynomial-time algorithm for constructing O(log k / log log k) cut and flow sparsifiers, matching the best existential upper bound on the quality of a sparsifier, and improving the previous algorithmic upper bound of O(log^2 k / log log k). We show that flow sparsifiers can be obtained from linear operators approximating minimum metric extensions. We introduce the notion of (linear) metric extension operators, prove that they exist, and give an exact polynomial-time algorithm for finding optimal operators. We then establish a direct connection between flow and cut sparsifiers and Lipschitz extendability of maps in Banach spaces, a notion studied in functional analysis since 1930s. Using this connection, we prove a lower bound of Omega(sqrt{log k/log log k}) for flow sparsifiers and a lower bound of Omega(sqrt{log k}/log log k) for cut sparsifiers. We show that if a certain open question posed by Ball in 1992 has a positive answer, then there exist \tilde O(sqrt{log k}) cut sparsifiers. On the other hand, any lower bound on cut sparsifiers better than \tilde Omega(sqrt{log k}) would imply a negative answer to this question.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Konstantin Makarychev, Yury Makarychev. 2010-06-23. Metric Extension Operators, Vertex Sparsifiers and Lipschitz Extendability. https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4607

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗