Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1011.6181

Computing the diameter polynomially faster than APSP

Raphael Yuster
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a new randomized algorithm for computing the diameter of a weighted directed graph. The algorithm runs in $\Ot(M^{\w/(\w+1)}n^{(\w^2+3)/(\w+1)})$ time, where $\w < 2.376$ is the exponent of fast matrix multiplication, $n$ is the number of vertices of the graph, and the edge weights are integers in $\{-M,...,0,...,M\}$. For bounded integer weights the running time is $O(n^{2.561})$ and if $\w=2+o(1)$ it is $\Ot(n^{7/3})$. This is the first algorithm that computes the diameter of an integer weighted directed graph polynomially faster than any known All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) algorithm. For bounded integer weights, the fastest algorithm for APSP runs in $O(n^{2.575})$ time for the present value of $\w$ and runs in $\Ot(n^{2.5})$ time if $\w=2+o(1)$. For directed graphs with {\em positive} integer weights in $\{1,...,M\}$ we obtain a deterministic algorithm that computes the diameter in $\Ot(Mn^\w)$ time. This extends a simple $\Ot(n^\w)$ algorithm for computing the diameter of an {\em unweighted} directed graph to the positive integer weighted setting and is the first algorithm in this setting whose time complexity matches that of the fastest known Diameter algorithm for {\em undirected} graphs. The diameter algorithms are consequences of a more general result. We construct algorithms that for any given integer $d$, report all ordered pairs of vertices having distance {\em at most} $d$. The diameter can therefore be computed using binary search for the smallest $d$ for which all pairs are reported.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Raphael Yuster. 2010-11-29. Computing the diameter polynomially faster than APSP. https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.6181

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗