arXiv · 1012.2179
Energy systematics of heavy nuclei -- mean field models in comparison
Abstract
We compare the systematics of binding energies computed within the standard and extended versions of the relativistic mean-field (RMF) model and the Skyrme Hartree-Fock (SHF) model. The general trends for the binding energies for super-heavy nuclei are significantly different for these models. The SHF models tend to underbind the superheavy nuclei, while, RMF models show just the opposite trend. The extended RMF model seems to provide remarkable improvements over the results obtained for the standard RMF model.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
P. -G. Reinhard, B. K. Agrawal. 2010-12-10. Energy systematics of heavy nuclei -- mean field models in comparison. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218301311018472
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.