SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1012.5713

A class of metrizable locally quasi-convex groups which are not Mackey

Abstract

A topological group $(G,μ)$ from a class $\mathcal G$ of MAP topological abelian groups will be called a {\it Mackey group} in $\mathcal G$ if it has the following property: if $ν$ is a group topology in $G$ such that $(G,ν)\in \mathcal G$ and $(G,ν)$ has the same continuous characters, say $(G,ν)^{\wedge}=(G,μ)^{\wedge}$, then $ν\le μ$. If $\rm{LCS}$ is the class of Hausdorff topological abelian groups which admit a structure of a locally convex topological vector space over $\mathbb R$, it is well-known that every metrizable $(G,μ) \in \rm{LCS}$ is a Mackey group in $\rm{LCS}$. For the class $\rm{LQC}$ of locally quasi-convex Hausdorff topological abelian groups, it was proved in 1999 that every {\bf complete} metrizable $(G,μ)\in \rm{LQC}$ is a Mackey group in $\rm{LQC}$ (\cite{CMPT}). The completeness cannot be \NB dropped within the class $\rm{LQC}$ as we prove in this paper. In fact, we provide a large family of metrizable precompact \NB(noncompact) groups which {\bf are not} Mackey groups in \rm{LQC} (Theorem \ref{basth}). Those examples are constructed from groups of the form $c_0(X)$, whose elements are the null sequences of a topological abelian group $X$, and whose topology is the uniform topology. We first show that for a compact metrizable group $X\ne\{0\}$ the topological group $c_0(X)$ is a non-compact complete metrizable locally quasi-convex group, which has {\bf countable} topological dual iff $X$ is connected. Then we prove that for a connected compact metrizable group $X\ne\{0\}$ the group $c_0(X)$ endowed with the product topology induced from the product $X^{\N}$ is metrizable precompact but not a Mackey group in LQC.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dikran Dikranjan, Elena Martín Peinador, Vaja Tarieladze. 2010-12-28. A class of metrizable locally quasi-convex groups which are not Mackey. https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5713

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN