Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1104.1700

Ultimate Meteorological Question from Observational Astronomers: How Good is the Cloud Cover Forecast?

Q. -Z. Ye·S. -S. Chen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To evaluate the capability of numerical cloud forecast as a meteorological reference for astronomical observation, we compare the cloud forecast from NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) model for total, layer and convective cloud with normalized satellite observation from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP), for the period of July 2005 to June 2008. In general, the model forecast is consistent with the ISCCP observation. For total cloud cover, our result shows the goodness of the GFS model forecast with a mean error within +/-15% in most areas. The global mean probability of < 30% forecast error (polar regions excluded) declines from 73% to 58% throughout the 180h forecast period, and is more skilled than ISCCP-based climatology forecast up to tau~120h. The comparison on layer clouds reveals a distinct negative regional tendency for low cloud forecast and a questionable positive global tendency for high cloud forecast. Fractional and binary comparisons are performed on convective cloud forecast and revealed the GFS model can only identify less than half of such cloud. In short, our result suggests that the GFS model can provide satisfactory worldwide total cloud forecast up to a week ahead for observation scheduling purpose, but layer and convective cloud forecast is less reliable than the total cloud forecast.

Explore related subjects

physics.ao-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Q. -Z. Ye, S. -S. Chen. 2012-10-24. Ultimate Meteorological Question from Observational Astronomers: How Good is the Cloud Cover Forecast?. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras%2Fsts278

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Windowed Envelope Statistics for Time-Domain Significant Wave Height Estimation From HF Radar

Significant wave height (SWH) retrieval from high-frequency (HF) radar typically relies on a weak second-order Doppler continuum that is sensitive to noise, interference, and spectral leakage. This letter presents a Windowed Envelope Statistics Estimator (WESE) that operates directly on beam-formed time-domain voltages. A second-order term obtained from a Neumann expansion of the rough-surface field equation motivates quadratic compensation of localized radar features. WESE extracts the mean, standard deviation, or variance from overlapping windows of the in-phase, quadrature, or envelope-magnitude sequence, followed by quadratic compensation, rank ordering, least-squares regression, and causal smoothing. Evaluation used 335 synchronized hourly observations from a 13.385 MHz, 12-element WERA system at Argentia, Newfoundland and Labrador. The optimal configuration used quadrature variance, a 16-sample window, 896 retained chronological samples, and 30-h smoothing, achieving an RMSE of 0.152 m and a Pearson correlation of 0.978. This represents RMSE reductions of 32.1% and 18.7% relative to previously reported linear and second-order compensated ordered-statistics models, respectively. The results demonstrate robust time-domain SWH estimation without explicit Doppler-spectrum construction.

physics.ao-ph↗
arXiv2026

KiloDA: Reconstructing kilometer-scale near-surface wind states from sparse station observations

Accurate kilometer-scale near-surface winds are important for understanding atmospheric processes over complex terrain, yet remain difficult to reconstruct from sparse and unevenly distributed observations. Here we introduce KiloDA, a diffusion framework for hourly kilometer-scale wind reconstruction from surface stations. KiloDA learns the statistical distribution and spatial structure of wind fields from historical 3-km Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model forecasts. At each reconstruction time, no contemporaneous WRF field is used. Instead, station observations provide the only constraints on the current atmospheric state and guide posterior sampling from the learned prior. In idealized WRF experiments, KiloDA recovers localized wind structures when only 0.24% of grid cells are observed and shows an overall advantage over conventional interpolation across terrain conditions and wind speed regimes. This capability largely transfers to real observations. In a fully withheld region, KiloDA reduces the median wind speed root mean square error (RMSE) by 19% relative to ERA5 reanalysis, using only observations outside the region, with the largest improvements over high-elevation and high-relief terrain. A random station holdout further confirms that this advantage extends across different complex-terrain locations and holdout configurations. These results show that historical model archives can provide useful structural knowledge for reconstructing kilometer-scale wind fields from sparse observations without requiring an accurate model estimate of the current atmospheric state.

physics.ao-ph↗