Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1104.4471

Towards a Data Reduction for the Minimum Flip Supertree Problem

Sebastian Böcker
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In computational phylogenetics, the problem of constructing a supertree of a given set of rooted input trees can be formalized in different ways, to cope with contradictory information in the input. We consider the Minimum Flip Supertree problem, where the input trees are transformed into a 0/1/?-matrix, such that each row represents a taxon, and each column represents an inner node of one of the input trees. Our goal is to find a perfect phylogeny for the input matrix requiring a minimum number of 0/1-flips, that is, corrections of 0/1-entries in the matrix. The problem is known to be NP-complete. Here, we present a parameterized data reduction with polynomial running time. The data reduction guarantees that the reduced instance has a solution if and only if the original instance has a solution. We then make our data reduction parameter-independent by using upper bounds. This allows us to preprocess an instance, and to solve the reduced instance with an arbitrary method. Different from an existing data reduction for the consensus tree problem, our reduction allows us to draw conclusions about certain entries in the matrix. We have implemented and evaluated our data reduction. Unfortunately, we find that the Minimum Flip Supertree problem is also hard in practice: The amount of information that can be derived during data reduction diminishes as instances get more "complicated", and running times for "complicated" instances quickly become prohibitive. Still, our method offers another route of attack for this relevant phylogenetic problem.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sebastian Böcker. 2011-04-22. Towards a Data Reduction for the Minimum Flip Supertree Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4471

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗