Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1108.5471

New Results on the Fault-Tolerant Facility Placement Problem

Li Yan·Marek Chrobak
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We studied the Fault-Tolerant Facility Placement problem (FTFP) which generalizes the uncapacitated facility location problem (UFL). In FTFP, we are given a set F of sites at which facilities can be built, and a set C of clients with some demands that need to be satisfied by different facilities. A client $j$ has demand $r_j$. Building one facility at a site $i$ incurs a cost $f_i$, and connecting one unit of demand from client $j$ to a facility at site $i\in\fac$ costs $d_{ij}$. $d_{ij}$'s are assumed to form a metric. A feasible solution specifies the number of facilities to be built at each site and the way to connect demands from clients to facilities, with the restriction that demands from the same client must go to different facilities. Facilities at the same site are considered different. The goal is to find a solution with minimum total cost. We gave a 1.7245-approximation algorithm to the FTFP problem. Our technique is via a reduction to the Fault-Tolerant Facility Location problem, in which each client has demand $r_j$ but each site can have at most one facility built.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Li Yan, Marek Chrobak. 2011-08-27. New Results on the Fault-Tolerant Facility Placement Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.5471

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗