Minimum Latency Submodular Cover

Sungjin Im; Viswanath Nagarajan; Ruben van der Zwaan

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1110.2207

Minimum Latency Submodular Cover

Sungjin Im·Viswanath Nagarajan·Ruben van der Zwaan

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the Minimum Latency Submodular Cover problem (MLSC), which consists of a metric $(V,d)$ with source $r\in V$ and $m$ monotone submodular functions $f_1, f_2, ..., f_m: 2^V \rightarrow [0,1]$. The goal is to find a path originating at $r$ that minimizes the total cover time of all functions. This generalizes well-studied problems, such as Submodular Ranking [AzarG11] and Group Steiner Tree [GKR00]. We give a polynomial time $O(\log \frac{1}{\eps} \cdot \log^{2+δ} |V|)$-approximation algorithm for MLSC, where $ε>0$ is the smallest non-zero marginal increase of any $\{f_i\}_{i=1}^m$ and $δ>0$ is any constant. We also consider the Latency Covering Steiner Tree problem (LCST), which is the special case of \mlsc where the $f_i$s are multi-coverage functions. This is a common generalization of the Latency Group Steiner Tree [GuptaNR10a,ChakrabartyS11] and Generalized Min-sum Set Cover [AzarGY09, BansalGK10] problems. We obtain an $O(\log^2|V|)$-approximation algorithm for LCST. Finally we study a natural stochastic extension of the Submodular Ranking problem, and obtain an adaptive algorithm with an $O(\log 1/ \eps)$ approximation ratio, which is best possible. This result also generalizes some previously studied stochastic optimization problems, such as Stochastic Set Cover [GoemansV06] and Shared Filter Evaluation [MunagalaSW07, LiuPRY08].

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sungjin Im, Viswanath Nagarajan, Ruben van der Zwaan. 2013-03-01. Minimum Latency Submodular Cover. https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2207

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗