Equilibria of Channel Selection Games in Parallel Multiple Access Channel

Samir M. Perlaza; Samson Lasaulce; Mérouane Debbah

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1112.1895

Equilibria of Channel Selection Games in Parallel Multiple Access Channel

Samir M. Perlaza·Samson Lasaulce·Mérouane Debbah

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we study the decentralized parallel multiple access channel (MAC) when transmitters selfishly maximize their individual spectral efficiency by selecting a single channel to transmit. More specifically, we investigate the set of Nash equilibria (NE) of decentralized networks comprising several transmitters communicating with a single receiver that implements single user decoding. This scenario is modeled as a one-shot game where the players (the transmitters) have discrete action sets (the channels). We show that the corresponding game has always at least one NE in pure strategies, but, depending on certain parameters, the game might possess several NE. We provide an upper bound for the maximum number of NE as a function of the number of transmitters and available channels. The main contribution of this paper is a mathematical proof of the existence of a Braess-type paradox. In particular, it is shown that under the assumption of a fully loaded network, when transmitters are allowed to use all the available channels, the corresponding sum spectral efficiency achieved at the NE is lower or equal than the sum spectral efficiency achieved when transmitters can use only one channel. A formal proof of this observation is provided in the case of small networks. For general scenarios, we provide numerical examples that show that the same effect holds as long as the network is kept fully loaded. We conclude the paper by considering the case of successive interference cancellation at the receiver. In this context, we show that the power allocation vectors at the NE are capacity maximizers. Finally, simulations are presented to verify our theoretical results.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Samir M. Perlaza, Samson Lasaulce, Mérouane Debbah. 2011-12-08. Equilibria of Channel Selection Games in Parallel Multiple Access Channel. https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.1895

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗