Topological approach to solve P versus NP

Koji Kobayashi

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1202.1194

Topological approach to solve P versus NP

Koji Kobayashi

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper talks about difference between P and NP by using topological space that mean resolution principle. I pay attention to restrictions of antecedent and consequent in resolution, and show what kind of influence the restrictions have for difference of structure between P and NP regarding relations of relation. First, I show the restrictions of antecedent and consequent in resolution principle. Antecedents connect each other, and consequent become a linkage between these antecedents. And we can make consequent as antecedents product by using some resolutions which have same joint variable. We can determine these consequents reducible and irreducible. Second, I introduce RCNF that mean topology of resolution principle in CNF. RCNF is HornCNF and that variable values are presence of restrictions of CNF formula clauses. RCNF is P-Complete. Last, I introduce TCNF that have 3CNF's character which relate 2 variables relations with 1 variable. I show CNF complexity by using CCNF that combine some TCNF. TCNF is NP-Complete and product irreducible. I introduce CCNF that connect TCNF like Moore graph. We cannot reduce CCNF to RCNF with polynomial size. Therefore, TCNF is not in P.

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Koji Kobayashi. 2012-02-06. Topological approach to solve P versus NP. https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.1194

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Max Independent Set Remains NP-hard when Excluding a Planar Induced Minor

We show that there is a fixed planar graph $H$, namely the $5 \times 5$ grid, such that Max Independent Set remains NP-hard in $H$-induced-minor-free graphs. This refutes the Dallard--Milani\v{c}--\v{S}torgel conjecture and a weakening of it by Gartland and Lokshtanov, and by Korhonen.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC↗