arXiv · 1203.1031
Are megaquakes clustered?
Abstract
We study statistical properties of the number of large earthquakes over the past century. We analyze the cumulative distribution of the number of earthquakes with magnitude larger than threshold M in time interval T, and quantify the statistical significance of these results by simulating a large number of synthetic random catalogs. We find that in general, the earthquake record cannot be distinguished from a process that is random in time. This conclusion holds whether aftershocks are removed or not, except at magnitudes below M = 7.3. At long time intervals (T = 2-5 years), we find that statistically significant clustering is present in the catalog for lower magnitude thresholds (M = 7-7.2). However, this clustering is due to a large number of earthquakes on record in the early part of the 20th century, when magnitudes are less certain.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Eric G. Daub, Eli Ben-Naim, Robert A. Guyer, Paul A. Johnson. 2012-03-05. Are megaquakes clustered?. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051465
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.