Sequential & Parallel Algorithms for Big-Integer Numbers Subtraction

Youssef Bassil; Aziz Barbar

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1204.0220

Sequential & Parallel Algorithms for Big-Integer Numbers Subtraction

Youssef Bassil·Aziz Barbar

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Many emerging computer applications require the processing of large numbers, larger than what a CPU can handle. In fact, the top of the line PCs can only manipulate numbers not longer than 32 bits or 64 bits. This is due to the size of the registers and the data-path inside the CPU. As a result, performing arithmetic operations such as subtraction on big-integer numbers is to some extend limited. Different algorithms were designed in an attempt to solve this problem; they all operate on big-integer numbers by first converting them into a binary representation then performing bitwise operations on single bits. Such algorithms are of complexity O(n) where n is the total number of bits in each operand. This paper proposes two new algorithms for performing arithmetic subtraction on big-integer numbers. The two algorithms are different in that one is sequential while the other is parallel. The similarity between them is that both follow the same concept of dividing the big-integer inputs into several blocks or tokens of 60 bits (18 digits) each; thus reducing the input size n in O(n) by a factor of 60. Subtraction of corresponding tokens, one from each operand, is performed as humans perform subtraction, using a pencil and a paper in the decimal system. Both algorithms are to be implemented using MS C#.NET 2005 and tested over a multiple processor system. Further studies can be done on other arithmetic operations such as addition and multiplication.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Youssef Bassil, Aziz Barbar. 2012-04-01. Sequential & Parallel Algorithms for Big-Integer Numbers Subtraction. https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0220

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗