SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1204.2844

On Vertex Sparsifiers with Steiner Nodes

Abstract

Given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with edge capacities $c_e\geq 1$ for $e\in E$ and a subset $T$ of $k$ vertices called terminals, we say that a graph $H$ is a quality-$q$ cut sparsifier for $G$ iff $T\subseteq V(H)$, and for any partition $(A,B)$ of $T$, the values of the minimum cuts separating $A$ and $B$ in graphs $G$ and $H$ are within a factor $q$ from each other. We say that $H$ is a quality-$q$ flow sparsifier for $G$ iff $T\subseteq V(H)$, and for any set $D$ of demands over the terminals, the values of the minimum edge congestion incurred by fractionally routing the demands in $D$ in graphs $G$ and $H$ are within a factor $q$ from each other. So far vertex sparsifiers have been studied in a restricted setting where the sparsifier $H$ is not allowed to contain any non-terminal vertices, that is $V(H)=T$. For this setting, efficient algorithms are known for constructing quality-$O(\log k/\log\log k)$ cut and flow vertex sparsifiers, as well as a lower bound of $\tilde{\Omega}(\sqrt{\log k})$ on the quality of any flow or cut sparsifier. We study flow and cut sparsifiers in the more general setting where Steiner vertices are allowed, that is, we no longer require that $V(H)=T$. We show algorithms to construct constant-quality cut sparsifiers of size $O(C^3)$ in time $\poly(n)\cdot 2^C$, and constant-quality flow sparsifiers of size $C^{O(\log\log C)}$ in time $n^{O(\log C)}\cdot 2^C$, where $C$ is the total capacity of the edges incident on the terminals.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Julia Chuzhoy. 2012-04-12. On Vertex Sparsifiers with Steiner Nodes. https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2844

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS