arXiv · 1205.6672
Reply to "Comment on 'Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations' "
Abstract
In this reply I address the comment by W-Y. Hwang and O. Gittsovich on my paper [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 82}, 032313 (2010)]. The authors of the comment point out that I use implicit assumption that the alphabet of the eavesdropper is binary. They claim that such assumption is unrealistic. Here I show that even without this assumption the main result of my paper still holds.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M. Pawlowski. 2012-05-30. Reply to "Comment on 'Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations' ". https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.85.046302
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.