Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1206.4605

Clustering to Maximize the Ratio of Split to Diameter

Jiabing Wang·Jiaye Chen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a weighted and complete graph G = (V, E), V denotes the set of n objects to be clustered, and the weight d(u, v) associated with an edge (u, v) belonging to E denotes the dissimilarity between objects u and v. The diameter of a cluster is the maximum dissimilarity between pairs of objects in the cluster, and the split of a cluster is the minimum dissimilarity between objects within the cluster and objects outside the cluster. In this paper, we propose a new criterion for measuring the goodness of clusters: the ratio of the minimum split to the maximum diameter, and the objective is to maximize the ratio. For k = 2, we present an exact algorithm. For k >= 3, we prove that the problem is NP-hard and present a factor of 2 approximation algorithm on the precondition that the weights associated with E satisfy the triangle inequality. The worst-case runtime of both algorithms is O(n^3). We compare the proposed algorithms with the Normalized Cut by applying them to image segmentation. The experimental results on both natural and synthetic images demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jiabing Wang, Jiaye Chen. 2012-06-18. Clustering to Maximize the Ratio of Split to Diameter. https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4605

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗