SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1207.1668

Fast Constructions of Light-Weight Spanners for General Graphs

Abstract

To our knowledge, there are only two known algorithms for constructing sparse and light spanners for general graphs. One of them is the greedy algorithm of Alth$\ddot{o}$fer et al. \cite{ADDJS93}, analyzed by Chandra et al. in SoCG'92. The greedy algorithm consructs, for every \emph{weighted} undirected $n$-vertex $m$-edge graph $G = (V,E)$ and any integer $k \ge 1$, a $(2k-1)$-spanner with $O(n^{1 + 1/k})$ edges and weight $O(k \cdot n^{(1+\eps)/k}) \cdot ω(MST(G))$, for any $\eps > 0$. The drawback of the greedy algorithm is that it requires $O(m \cdot (n^{1 + 1/k} + n \cdot \log n))$ time. The other algorithm is due to Awerbuch et al. \cite{ABP91}. It constructs $O(k)$-spanners with $O(k \cdot n^{1 + 1/k} \cdot Λ)$ edges, weight $O(k^2 \cdot n^{1/k} \cdot Λ) \cdot ω(MST(G))$, within time $O(m \cdot k \cdot n^{1/k} \cdot Λ)$, where $Λ$ is the logarithm of the aspect ratio of the graph. The running time of both these algorithms is unsatisfactory. Moreover, the usually faster algorithm of \cite{ABP91} pays for the speedup by significantly increasing both the stretch, the sparsity, and the weight of the resulting spanner. In this paper we devise an efficient algorithm for constructing sparse and light spanners. Specifically, our algorithm constructs $((2k-1) \cdot (1+\eps))$-spanners with $O(k \cdot n^{1 + 1/k})$ edges and weight $O(k \cdot n^{1/k}) \cdot ω(MST(G))$, where $\eps > 0$ is an arbitrarily small constant. The running time of our algorithm is $O(k \cdot m + \min\{n \cdot \log n,m \cdot α(n)\})$. Moreover, by slightly increasing the running time we can reduce the other parameters. These results address an open problem from the ESA'04 paper by Roditty and Zwick \cite{RZ04}.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael Elkin, Shay Solomon. 2012-07-06. Fast Constructions of Light-Weight Spanners for General Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1668

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS