Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1207.4383

Equivalence between Priority Queues and Sorting in External Memory

Zhewei Wei·Ke Yi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A priority queue is a fundamental data structure that maintains a dynamic ordered set of keys and supports the followig basic operations: insertion of a key, deletion of a key, and finding the smallest key. The complexity of the priority queue is closely related to that of sorting: A priority queue can be used to implement a sorting algorithm trivially. Thorup \cite{thorup2007equivalence} proved that the converse is also true in the RAM model. In particular, he designed a priority queue that uses the sorting algorithm as a black box, such that the per-operation cost of the priority queue is asymptotically the same as the per-key cost of sorting. In this paper, we prove an analogous result in the external memory model, showing that priority queues are computationally equivalent to sorting in external memory, under some mild assumptions. The reduction provides a possibility for proving lower bounds for external sorting via showing a lower bound for priority queues.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zhewei Wei, Ke Yi. 2012-07-18. Equivalence between Priority Queues and Sorting in External Memory. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4383

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗