Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1207.4681

Nonblocker in H-minor free graphs: kernelization meets discharging

Lukasz Kowalik
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Perhaps the best known kernelization result is the kernel of size 335k for the Planar Dominating Set problem by Alber et al. [JACM 2004], later improved to 67k by Chen et al. [SICOMP 2007]. This result means roughly, that the problem of finding the smallest dominating set in a planar graph is easy when the optimal solution is small. On the other hand, it is known that Planar Dominating Set parameterized by k'=|V|-k (also known as Planar Nonblocker) has a kernel of size 2k'. This means that Planar Dominating Set is easy when the optimal solution is very large. We improve the kernel for Planar Nonblocker to 7/4k'. This also implies that Planar Dominating Set has no kernel of size at most (7/3-epsilon)k, for any epsilon>0, unless P=NP. This improves the previous lower bound of (2-epsilon)k of Chen et al. Both of these results immediately generalize to H-minor free graphs (without changing the constants). In our proof of the bound on the kernel size we use a variant of the discharging method (used e.g. in the proof of the four color theorem). We give some arguments that this method is natural in the context of kernelization and we hope it will be applied to get improved kernel size bounds for other problems as well. As a by-product we show a result which might be of independent interest: every n-vertex graph with no isolated vertices and such that every pair of degree 1 vertices is at distance at least 5 and every pair of degree 2 vertices is at distance at least 2 has a dominating set of size at most 3/7n.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DMmath.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lukasz Kowalik. 2012-07-19. Nonblocker in H-minor free graphs: kernelization meets discharging. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4681

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗