SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1207.6986

Two Embedding Theorems for Data with Equivalences under Finite Group Action

Abstract

There is recent interest in compressing data sets for non-sequential settings, where lack of obvious orderings on their data space, require notions of data equivalences to be considered. For example, Varshney & Goyal (DCC, 2006) considered multiset equivalences, while Choi & Szpankowski (IEEE Trans. IT, 2012) considered isomorphic equivalences in graphs. Here equivalences are considered under a relatively broad framework - finite-dimensional, non-sequential data spaces with equivalences under group action, for which analogues of two well-studied embedding theorems are derived: the Whitney embedding theorem and the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma. Only the canonical data points need to be carefully embedded, each such point representing a set of data points equivalent under group action. Two-step embeddings are considered. First, a group invariant is applied to account for equivalences, and then secondly, a linear embedding takes it down to low-dimensions. Our results require hypotheses on discriminability of the applied invariant, such notions related to seperating invariants (Dufresne, 2008), and completeness in pattern recognition (Kakarala, 1992). In the latter theorem, the embedding complexity depends on the size of the canonical part, which may be significantly smaller than the whole data set, up to a factor equal to the size the group.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Fabian Lim. 2012-10-15. Two Embedding Theorems for Data with Equivalences under Finite Group Action. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6986

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS