arXiv · 1212.2077
Phase Field Models versus Parametric Front Tracking Methods: Are they accurate and computationally efficient?
Abstract
We critically compare the practicality and accuracy of numerical approximations of phase field models and sharp interface models of solidification. Particular emphasis is put on Stefan problems, and their quasi-static variants, with applications to crystal growth. New approaches with a high mesh quality for the parametric approximations of the resulting free boundary problems and new stable discretizations of the anisotropic phase field system are taken into account in a comparison involving benchmark problems based on exact solutions of the free boundary problem.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
John W. Barrett, Harald Garcke, Robert Nürnberg. 2012-12-10. Phase Field Models versus Parametric Front Tracking Methods: Are they accurate and computationally efficient?. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.190313.010813a
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.