SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1303.3331

Some logically weak Ramseyan theorems

Abstract

We study four families of consequences of Ramsey's Theorem from the viewpoint of reverse mathematics. The first, which we call the Achromatic Ramsey Theorem, is from a partition relation introduced by Erdős, Hajnal and Rado: $ω\to [ω]^r_{c,\leq d}$, which asserts that for every $f: [ω]^r \to c$ there exists an infinite $H$ with $|f([H]^r)| \leq d$. The second and third are the Free Set Theorem and the Thin Set Theorem, which were introduced by Harvey Friedman. And the last is the Rainbow Ramsey Theorem. We show that, most theorems from these families are quite weak, i.e., they are strictly weaker than $\operatorname{ACA}_0$ over $\operatorname{RCA}_0$. Interestingly, these families turn out to be closely related. We establish the so-called strong cone avoidance property of most instances of the Achromatic Ramsey Theorem by an induction of exponents, then apply this and a similar induction to obtain the strong cone avoidance property of the Free Set Theorem. From the strong cone avoidance property of the Achromatic Ramsey Theorem and the Free Set Theorem, we derive the strong cone property of the Thin Set Theorem and the Rainbow Ramsey Theorem. It follws easily that a theorem with the strong cone avoidance property does not imply $\operatorname{ACA}_0$ over $\operatorname{RCA}_0$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wei Wang. 2014-08-07. Some logically weak Ramseyan theorems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2014.05.003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO