SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1303.5631

Th\'eorie de la mesure dans les lieux r\'eguliers. ou : Les intersections cach\'ees dans le paradoxe de Banach-Tarski

Abstract

It is well known that axiom of choice implies the existence of non-measurable sets for Lebesgue's measure on R as well as the existence of "paradoxical" decompositions of the unit ball of R^3 (Banach-Tarski). This is generally interpreted as the price to be paid for the numerous services provided by this axiom. The theory proposed by Olivier Leroy shows that we can have simultaneously axiom of choice and " everything is measurable " it takes place within the framework of "locales" which are particular cases of Grothendieck's toposes : a "locale" is just a poset which has the formal properties of the poset of open subsets of a topological space. "Locales" have already been the object of numerous studies (cf for example "Sheaves in Geometry and Logic" of S.Mac Lane and I.Moerdijk. Springer 92.). One of the remarkable aspects of this theory is that it applies in a relevant way to the usual topological spaces in which it shows up " non standard sub-spaces " (sub-locales)); with for consequence that the intersection (in the meaning of locale) of ordinary sub-spaces is not anymore necessarily a (ordinary) sub-space. We have for example a sub-locale of R (called generic sub-locale of R) which is the intersection of dense open sets and which is still dense (although pointless). The most striking result is doubtless that the natural continuation of the measure of Lebesgue (on [0,1] for example) on the open sets to the totality of sub-locales of [0,1] is a sigma additive outside regular measure The "paradoxical " partitions which gave non-measurable subsets in the classical context are no more partitions in the context of locales. There are hidden intersections.... Jean-Malgoire et Christine Voisin

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Olivier Leroy. 2013-03-22. Th\'eorie de la mesure dans les lieux r\'eguliers. ou : Les intersections cach\'ees dans le paradoxe de Banach-Tarski. https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5631

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN