SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1303.6867

Parameterized algorithms for the 2-clustering problem with minimum sum and minimum sum of squares objective functions

Abstract

In the {\sc Min-Sum 2-Clustering} problem, we are given a graph and a parameter $k$, and the goal is to determine if there exists a 2-partition of the vertex set such that the total conflict number is at most $k$, where the conflict number of a vertex is the number of its non-neighbors in the same cluster and neighbors in the different cluster. The problem is equivalent to {\sc 2-Cluster Editing} and {\sc 2-Correlation Clustering} with an additional multiplicative factor two in the cost function. In this paper we show an algorithm for {\sc Min-Sum 2-Clustering} with time complexity $O(n\cdot 2.619^{r/(1-4r/n)}+n^3)$, where $n$ is the number of vertices and $r=k/n$. Particularly, the time complexity is $O^*(2.619^{k/n})$ for $k\in o(n^2)$ and polynomial for $k\in O(n\log n)$, which implies that the problem can be solved in subexponential time for $k\in o(n^2)$. We also design a parameterized algorithm for a variant in which the cost is the sum of the squared conflict-numbers. For $k\in o(n^3)$, the algorithm runs in subexponential $O(n^3\cdot 5.171^θ)$ time, where $θ=\sqrt{k/n}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bang Ye Wu, Li-Hsuan Chen. 2014-02-06. Parameterized algorithms for the 2-clustering problem with minimum sum and minimum sum of squares objective functions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-014-9874-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS