The Beachcombers' Problem: Walking and Searching with Mobile Robots

Jurek Czyzowicz; Leszek Gasieniec; Konstantinos Georgiou; Evangelos Kranakis; Fraser MacQuarrie

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1304.7693

The Beachcombers' Problem: Walking and Searching with Mobile Robots

Jurek Czyzowicz·Leszek Gasieniec·Konstantinos Georgiou·Evangelos Kranakis·Fraser MacQuarrie

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We introduce and study a new problem concerning the exploration of a geometric domain by mobile robots. Consider a line segment $[0,I]$ and a set of $n$ mobile robots $r_1,r_2,..., r_n$ placed at one of its endpoints. Each robot has a {\em searching speed} $s_i$ and a {\em walking speed} $w_i$, where $s_i <w_i$. We assume that each robot is aware of the number of robots of the collection and their corresponding speeds. At each time moment a robot $r_i$ either walks along a portion of the segment not exceeding its walking speed $w_i$ or searches a portion of the segment with the speed not exceeding $s_i$. A search of segment $[0,I]$ is completed at the time when each of its points have been searched by at least one of the $n$ robots. We want to develop {\em mobility schedules} (algorithms) for the robots which complete the search of the segment as fast as possible. More exactly we want to maximize the {\em speed} of the mobility schedule (equal to the ratio of the segment length versus the time of the completion of the schedule). We analyze first the offline scenario when the robots know the length of the segment that is to be searched. We give an algorithm producing a mobility schedule for arbitrary walking and searching speeds and prove its optimality. Then we propose an online algorithm, when the robots do not know in advance the actual length of the segment to be searched. The speed $S$ of such algorithm is defined as $S = \inf_{I_L} S(I_L)$ where $S(I_L)$ denotes the speed of searching of segment $I_L=[0,L]$. We prove that the proposed online algorithm is 2-competitive. The competitive ratio is shown to be better in the case when the robots' walking speeds are all the same.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jurek Czyzowicz, Leszek Gasieniec, Konstantinos Georgiou, Evangelos Kranakis, Fraser MacQuarrie. 2013-04-29. The Beachcombers' Problem: Walking and Searching with Mobile Robots. https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7693

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗