arXiv · 1305.4671
Not all entangled states violate Leggett's crypto-nonlocality
Abstract
This note is a reply to M. Navascués' claim that "all entangled states violate Leggett's crypto-nonlocality" [arXiv:1303.5124v2]. I argue that such a conclusion can only be reached if one introduces additional assumptions that further restrict Leggett's notion of "crypto-nonlocality". If a contrario one sticks only to Leggett's original axioms, there exist entangled states whose correlations are always compatible with Leggett's crypto-nonlocality---which is thus a genuinely different concept from quantum separability. I clarify in this note the relation between these two notions, together also with Bell's assumption of local causality.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Cyril Branciard. 2013-10-18. Not all entangled states violate Leggett's crypto-nonlocality. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.88.042113
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.