SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1306.3295

Rethinking Abstractions for Big Data: Why, Where, How, and What

Abstract

Big data refers to large and complex data sets that, under existing approaches, exceed the capacity and capability of current compute platforms, systems software, analytical tools and human understanding. Numerous lessons on the scalability of big data can already be found in asymptotic analysis of algorithms and from the high-performance computing (HPC) and applications communities. However, scale is only one aspect of current big data trends; fundamentally, current and emerging problems in big data are a result of unprecedented complexity--in the structure of the data and how to analyze it, in dealing with unreliability and redundancy, in addressing the human factors of comprehending complex data sets, in formulating meaningful analyses, and in managing the dense, power-hungry data centers that house big data. The computer science solution to complexity is finding the right abstractions, those that hide as much triviality as possible while revealing the essence of the problem that is being addressed. The "big data challenge" has disrupted computer science by stressing to the very limits the familiar abstractions which define the relevant subfields in data analysis, data management and the underlying parallel systems. As a result, not enough of these challenges are revealed by isolating abstractions in a traditional software stack or standard algorithmic and analytical techniques, and attempts to address complexity either oversimplify or require low-level management of details. The authors believe that the abstractions for big data need to be rethought, and this reorganization needs to evolve and be sustained through continued cross-disciplinary collaboration.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mary Hall, Robert M. Kirby, Feifei Li, Miriah Meyer, Valerio Pascucci, Jeff M. Phillips, Rob Ricci, Jacobus Van der Merwe, Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2013-06-14. Rethinking Abstractions for Big Data: Why, Where, How, and What. https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.3295

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Reconstructions of Konrad Zuse's Z3 Computer

This paper reviews the various reconstructions of Konrad Zuse's Z3 computer, built in 1941. The first is the reconstruction made by Zuse himself in the 1960s, which is now housed at the Deutsches Museum in Munich. Second is the 2001 reconstruction, made in Berlin, and which has a didactic purpose. Third is the Z3r, a Z3 reconstruction built by Horst Zuse in honor of his father's 100th birthday. Fourth is the reconstruction by Christoph Traber in Switzerland. All of these machines strive to preserve the cultural heritage that the Z3 represents.

cs.GL

A Brief History of Fr\'echet Distances: From Curves and Probability Laws to FID

This note provides a chronological account of Fr\'echet distances, starting with Maurice Fr\'echet's 1906 doctoral thesis on distances in abstract sets and tracing the Fr\'echet distance between polygonal curves and its algorithmic computation in the 1990s. It then continues with his 1957 paper on a coupling-based distance between probability laws with a brief glimpse of Wasserstein distance and optimal transport. We further attempt to draw connections between the distributional, coupling-based facet of Fr\'echet distances on probability laws and the geometric facet on curves. The note ends with a modern use case, the Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID) in the era of deep generative model evaluation, interpretable as the Wasserstein-2 distance between multivariate Gaussians in a learned feature space. An appendix includes \TeX{}ified faithful English translations of Fr\'echet's 1906 thesis and 1957 paper, and L\'evy's 1950 note for reader convenience.

cs.GL

The Theorems of Dr. David Blackwell and Their Contributions to Artificial Intelligence

Dr. David Blackwell was a mathematician and statistician of the first rank, whose contributions to statistical theory, game theory, and decision theory predated many of the algorithmic breakthroughs that define modern artificial intelligence. This survey examines three of his most consequential theoretical results the Rao Blackwell theorem, the Blackwell Approachability theorem, and the Blackwell Informativeness theorem (comparison of experiments) and traces their direct influence on contemporary AI and machine learning. We show that these results, developed primarily in the 1940s and 1950s, remain technically live across modern subfields including Markov Chain Monte Carlo inference, autonomous mobile robot navigation (SLAM), generative model training, no-regret online learning, reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), large language model alignment, and information design. NVIDIAs 2024 decision to name their flagship GPU architecture (Blackwell) provides vivid testament to his enduring relevance. We also document an emerging frontier: explicit Rao Blackwellized variance reduction in LLM RLHF pipelines, recently proposed but not yet standard practice. Together, Blackwell theorems form a unified framework addressing information compression, sequential decision making under uncertainty, and the comparison of information sources precisely the problems at the core of modern AI.

cs.GL