Some reflections on why Lobachevsky geometry was recognized

V. V. Prasolov; A. B. Skopenkov

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1307.4902

Some reflections on why Lobachevsky geometry was recognized

V. V. Prasolov·A. B. Skopenkov

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sometimes arguments that preceded recognition of non-Euclidean (Lobachevsky) geometry are represented in a simplified `black and white' pattern: `conservators made nonsense of genius'. Although there is something in this point of view, the real situation was more complicated, and up to some time there were decent grounds for not recognizing the importance of the new theory. We try to explain why non-Euclidean geometry was not recognized at once. We show how important for such recognition was discovery of applications of the new geometry. These reflections have practical importance for modern mathematics because they are related to the question: how a mathematician should choose directions for research?

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

V. V. Prasolov, A. B. Skopenkov. 2013-07-18. Some reflections on why Lobachevsky geometry was recognized. https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.4902

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗