arXiv · 1308.2928
Investigating the limits of randomized benchmarking protocols
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the performance of randomized benchmarking protocols on gate sets under a variety of realistic error models that include systematic rotations, amplitude damping, leakage to higher levels, and 1/f noise. We find that, in almost all cases, benchmarking provides better than a factor-of-two estimate of average error rate, suggesting that randomized benchmarking protocols are a valuable tool for verification and validation of quantum operations. In addition, we derive new models for fidelity decay curves under certain types of non-Markovian noise models such as 1/f and leakage errors. We also show that, provided the standard error of the fidelity measurements is small, only a small number of trials are required for high confidence estimation of gate errors.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jeffrey M. Epstein, Andrew W. Cross, Easwar Magesan, Jay M. Gambetta. 2013-08-13. Investigating the limits of randomized benchmarking protocols. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.89.062321
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.