Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1308.2929

Cosmologia e Representa\c{c}\~ao

Marcelo Byrro Ribeiro
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This work presents a brief and non-technical description of the main results and concepts of the modern scientific cosmology, viewing it from an epistemological perspective which allows a dialog with other modes of thinking like e.g. history, philosophy, sociology and religion. This epistemological viewpoint is based on the philosophical theses advanced by Ludwig Boltzmann (1844-1906) which states that scientific theories are nothing more than representations, or images, of nature (arXiv:physics/0701308v1). By being representations one cannot know how nature really is because the intrinsic and indispensable properties that characterize nature are unreachable by science. In other words, the true essences that constitute nature are unknowable. Therefore, all answers proposed by science are partial, simplified and replaceable. Another way of putting forward this viewpoint is to state that all scientific truths are provisional, a result which naturally leads to the conclusion that the same set of phenomena, or scientific questions, may have various answers, or representations. This conclusion is generally known as theoretical pluralism (arXiv:physics/9806011). It is exactly such a plurality for conceiving, or representing, nature that opens the way for a possibly fruitful dialog among the various forms of thinking, since this dialog can take place in the realm of the representations. A few examples taken from cosmology, sociology and theology are discussed in the context of this epistemological framework.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Marcelo Byrro Ribeiro. 2013-08-13. Cosmologia e Representa\c{c}\~ao. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.3232.4562

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Scientific Promise

Scientists constantly face decisions about what lines of research to pursue. This Element introduces the philosophical debate about scientific pursuitworthiness. It explains how it can be rational to pursue a theory even if the theory is less well supported than its rivals, and it discusses existing philosophical frameworks for guiding pursuit decisions. The Element also develops a new perspective. Existing accounts focus predominantly on theories, while experiments are largely neglected. This is an important shortcoming. Theoretical promise depends on experimental promise, and experimental promise raises questions of its own. Drawing on the epistemology of experimentation, the Element advances an account of experimental pursuitworthiness. It is argued that such pursuitworthiness depends on experimental virtues like a clear signal and simplicity of design. Moreover, the kinds of uncertainty that constrain the assessment of scientific pursuits are examined. Finally, the Element highlights open questions in the philosophy of scientific pursuitworthiness.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

Is Black Hole Evaporation Prediction Friendly?

Manchak and Weatherall (2018) formulate the black hole information paradox as a failure of predictability in black hole evaporation spacetimes, diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I offer a strategy for resolving this paradox. I argue that failures of predictability in black hole evaporation are not well diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I then consider two weakenings of global hyperbolicity: prediction and retrodiction friendliness, the failure of which could ground a new paradox. However, deidealized black hole evaporation models can be prediction and retrodiction friendly. Therefore, the information paradox cannot be based upon failures of global hyperbolicity, nor either retrodiction or prediction unfriendliness.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

The Crab Nebula progenitor: recovering the 1054 AD supernova event as galactic Gamma-ray burst

In 1054 AD a daytime star appeared in the constellation of Taurus, for three weeks, and it was reported in various sources from Europe to China/Japan: it was one of the few documented galactic supernovae of the last two millenia. This paradigm has been established about sixty years ago, as the comprehension of the physics of supernovae progressed with enough observational data. The Gamma-ray bursts were discovered in the same period, but only in the past few years have their observations become daily and their distances have been fully understood as cosmological. After the explosion, the exponential decay of the luminosity in gamma-rays and X-rays has been followed with telescopes onboard dedicated satellites. Also the exponential decay of the afterglow's optical and radio frequencies have been observed with the largest optical and radio telescopes. Within the binary-driven hypernova framework, successful in explaining all the observed phases of the Gamma-ray bursts, the universal exponential decay can be extended to 1000 years after the burst, to account for the present values of Gamma and X-rays as well as optical and radio frequencies of the Crab Nebula. Both the daytime visibility of the burst, and the simultaneous radiation plagues appeared in Constantinople and Cairo is a strong evidence of the presence of Gamma-rays in the lower atmosphere, coming from the same source originating the Crab nebula. The association to the daytime visibility of that star and the following plague meets exactly the etymology of the word dis-aster, bad star.

physics.hist-ph↗