SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1309.0829

A Propositional Linear Time Logic with Time Flow Isomorphic to \omega^2

Abstract

Primarily guided with the idea to express zero-time transitions by means of temporal propositional language, we have developed a temporal logic where the time flow is isomorphic to ordinal $\omega^2$ (concatenation of $\omega$ copies of $\omega$). If we think of $\omega^2$ as lexicographically ordered $\omega\times \omega$, then any particular zero-time transition can be represented by states whose indices are all elements of some $\{n\}\times\omega$. In order to express non-infinitesimal transitions, we have introduced a new unary temporal operator $[\omega] $ ($\omega$-jump), whose effect on the time flow is the same as the effect of $\alpha\mapsto \alpha+\omega$ in $\omega^2$. In terms of lexicographically ordered $\omega\times \omega$, $[\omega] \phi$ is satisfied in $\ < i,j\ >$-th time instant iff $\phi$ is satisfied in $\ < i+1,0\ >$-th time instant. Moreover, in order to formally capture the natural semantics of the until operator $\mathtt U$, we have introduced a local variant $\mathtt u$ of the until operator. More precisely, $\phi\,\mathtt u \psi$ is satisfied in $\ < i,j\ >$-th time instant iff $\psi$ is satisfied in $\ < i,j+k\ >$-th time instant for some nonnegative integer $k$, and $\phi$ is satisfied in $\ < i,j+l\ >$-th time instant for all $0\leqslant l<k$. As in many of our previous publications, the leitmotif is the usage of infinitary inference rules in order to achieve the strong completeness.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bojan Marinković, Zoran Ognjanović, Dragan Doder, Aleksandar Perović. 2013-09-03. A Propositional Linear Time Logic with Time Flow Isomorphic to \omega^2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2014.03.002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO